O iloiloga ma su'esu'ega i luga ole laiga e foliga mai e a'afia leaga ile tulaga leaga ole tau ile aso na tusia ai. O le leaga o le tau e tutusa ma le tele o faitioga i nisi auiliiliga.

E tusa ai ma suʻesuʻega fou mai le Iunivesite Eperu o Ierusalema (HU) ma le Iunivesite o Lucerne, Suiselani. O le suʻesuʻega maeʻaeʻa, lomia i le Journal of Consumer Research, ua faʻaalia ai o le leaga o le tau e faʻaalia ai mea na tutupu i taimi ua tuanaʻi.

O le malamalama i le auala e faia ai manatu ma faia faaiuga i luga o le initaneti o le taulaiga lea o le suʻesuʻega a Dr. Yaniv Dover o le HU Jerusalem Business School ma le Federmann Center mo le suʻesuʻeina o le Rationality.

O suʻesuʻega a Dr. Dover, i le galulue faʻatasi ma Prof. Leif Brandes i le Iunivesite o Lucerne, Suiselani, na faʻaaogaina ai le 12 tausaga o faʻamaumauga ma le 3 miliona o tusi faletalimalo e suʻesuʻe ai pe faʻafefea ona 340,000 faʻamatalaga i luga ole laiga o faletalimalo. aafia i le tau i le aso na tusia ai.

O se iloiloga lavelave lea e aofia ai le fetaui i le va o le resitalaina na faia e le tagata faatau ma le iloiloga tusitusia, faailoaina o le tau i le nofoaga o le tagata suʻesuʻe, le faʻavasegaga o fetu na tuʻuina atu, faʻavasegaina o upu faʻaaogaina e faʻamatala ai le nofo, ma le tau na oʻo i le taimi nofo i le faletalimalo. Na faʻaaogaina foi e le au suʻesuʻe se faʻataʻitaʻiga faʻapitoa faʻamaumauga e faʻatatau mo le faʻaiuga e tuʻuina atu se iloiloga ma mea o loʻo i totonu o le iloiloga.

O le leaga o le tau (timu po'o le kiona) na fa'aitiitia ai le iloiloga a le au su'esu'e o latou poto masani i faletalimalo.

O le mea moni, o le leaga o le tau na matua afaina ai iloiloga i le tulaga e toetoe lava a faʻaititia se faletalimalo mai le 5- i le 4-star rating. O le leaga o le tau na mafua ai ona tusia e le au fai iloiloga le umi ma sili atu ona faitio ma auiliili iloiloga. O suʻesuʻega na faʻaalia ai i aso timuga, e maualuga atu le avanoa e filifili ai e tusi se iloiloga ma o le aʻafiaga o le tau i lena aso o le tau e tutoatasi mai le tau na latou oʻo i ai i le taimi na latou nonofo ai. fa'aoso nisi manatuaga le lelei pe fa'aoso se lagona le lelei e valivali ai le iloiloga.

"O lenei suʻesuʻega e sili atu le lautele o aʻafiaga aua o loʻo faʻaalia, mo le taimi muamua, pe faʻafefea ona avea o tatou siosiomaga faaletino i fafo-i lenei tulaga o le tau-e mafai ona avea ma se vaega i a tatou faamasinoga i luga ole laiga," o le tala lea a Dover. "O lenei ituaiga o suʻesuʻega" o loʻo faʻaalia ai se vaega o le malosi o la tatou lalolagi numera fou ... ma e mafai ona fesoasoani i le au fai faiga faʻavae faʻavae faiga faʻavae e faʻainisinia atili ai se aafiaga sili atu ona aoga ma maloloina o gaioiga i luga ole laiga io tatou olaga i aso uma."

Tele tala fou e uiga i faletalimalo

OA MEA E AVEA MAI LENEI TUSI:

The research showed that on rainy days, there was a higher chance of deciding to write a review and that the effect of weather that day’s weather was independent of the weather they experienced during their stay The authors suggest that this effect may be because bad weather days trigger more negative memories or induce a negative mood which colors the review.
This was a complex evaluation that included matching between the booking made by the consumer and the written review, identifying the weather at the location of the reviewer, the star rating given, classification of vocabulary used to describe the stay, and the weather experienced during the stay at the hotel.
Leif Brandes at the University of Lucerne, Switzerland, used 12 years of data and 3 million hotel bookings to examine how 340,000 anonymous online reviews of hotels were influenced by the weather on the day they were written.